Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLVX vs RMFEX
FSLVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FSLVX vs RMFEX
FSLVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSLVX (787M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than FSLVX: RMFEX (1.45) vs FSLVX (1.04). FSLVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FSLVX (25 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). FSLVX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FSLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). FSLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FSLVX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FSLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.30 vs. RMFEX (10.46). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. FSLVX (21.49).
| FSLVX | RMFEX | FSLVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.62 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.62 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.874 | 5.987 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 10.46 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.21 | 35.96 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.49 | 35.97 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.25 | 99.50 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers