Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLVX vs RMFEX
FSLVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FSLVX vs RMFEX
FSLVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSLVX (787M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than FSLVX: RMFEX (1.45) vs FSLVX (1.04). FSLVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FSLVX (25 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). FSLVX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FSLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). FSLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FSLVX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FSLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. RMFEX (9.59). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. FSLVX (26.14).
| FSLVX | RMFEX | FSLVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.62 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.62 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.931 | 6.513 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.56 | 9.59 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.17 | 36.18 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.14 | 37.80 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.69 | 104.37 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement