FSLY
Price
$8.50
Change
+$0.16 (+1.92%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
30 days until earnings call
PMCUF
Price
$197.86
Change
-$7.14 (-3.48%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
20.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSLY vs PMCUF

Header iconFSLY vs PMCUF Comparison
Open Charts FSLY vs PMCUFBanner chart's image
Fastly
Price$8.50
Change+$0.16 (+1.92%)
Volume$1.94M
Capitalization1.25B
Pro Medicus
Price$197.86
Change-$7.14 (-3.48%)
Volume$4
Capitalization20.61B
FSLY vs PMCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSLY vs. PMCUF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLY is a StrongBuy and PMCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FSLY: $8.50 vs. PMCUF: $197.86)
Brand notoriety: FSLY: Notable vs. PMCUF: Not notable
FSLY represents the Packaged Software, while PMCUF is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSLY: 61% vs. PMCUF: 2%
Market capitalization -- FSLY: $1.25B vs. PMCUF: $20.61B
FSLY [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.25B. PMCUF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $20.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $305.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $47.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FSLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than FSLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PMCUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the short-term than FSLY.

Price Growth

FSLY (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.36%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.68% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCUF($20.6B) has a higher market cap than FSLY($1.25B). PMCUF YTD gains are higher at: 27.430 vs. FSLY (-9.958). PMCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 165M vs. FSLY (-59.56M). FSLY has more cash in the bank: 321M vs. PMCUF (209M). PMCUF has less debt than FSLY: PMCUF (2.26M) vs FSLY (410M). FSLY has higher revenues than PMCUF: FSLY (571M) vs PMCUF (213M).
FSLYPMCUFFSLY / PMCUF
Capitalization1.25B20.6B6%
EBITDA-59.56M165M-36%
Gain YTD-9.95827.430-36%
P/E RatioN/A272.87-
Revenue571M213M268%
Total Cash321M209M154%
Total Debt410M2.26M18,182%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSLY vs PMCUF: Fundamental Ratings
FSLY
PMCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
9519
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5017

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSLY's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCUF (97). This means that FSLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSLY (100). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSLY’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSLY (95). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSLY’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FSLY (43). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew similarly to FSLY’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSLY (100). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSLYPMCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JXI77.110.99
+1.31%
iShares Global Utilities ETF
IJH65.340.66
+1.02%
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
TGRW45.150.13
+0.29%
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
FMCE26.99N/A
N/A
FM Compounders Equity ETF
DRIP7.97-0.12
-1.48%
Direxion Dly S&P Oil&Gs Ex&Prd Br 2X ETF

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCUF and OCLCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCUF and OCLCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
-3.48%
OCLCF - PMCUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.71%
TMSNY - PMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
FSLY - PMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
NEXXY - PMCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMNSF - PMCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More