Ad is loading...
FSLZX vs FSMAX
FSLZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs FSMAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp Z
Price$39.70
Change-$1.62 (-3.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$76.01
Change-$3.55 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
FSLZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. FSLZX (2.34B). FSLZX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FSLZX (0.81) vs FSMAX (0.53). FSLZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FSLZX (8 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FSLZX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSLZX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. FSLZX (-4.20). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.38 vs. FSLZX (50.61).
| FSLZX | FSMAX | FSLZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,571% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.259 | -12.456 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 36.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.53 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.20 | -1.02 | 411% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.60 | 8.74 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.61 | 67.38 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...