Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLZX vs FSMAX
FSLZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs FSMAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp Z
Price$47.19
Change+$0.33 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.21
Change+$1.04 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
FSLZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. FSLZX (2.17B). FSLZX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FSLZX (0.75) vs FSMAX (0.47). FSLZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FSLZX (8 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FSLZX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSLZX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.52 vs. FSLZX (9.68). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.55 vs. FSLZX (50.52).
| FSLZX | FSMAX | FSLZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,571% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.041 | 2.520 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 39.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.47 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.68 | 16.52 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.74 | 51.50 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.52 | 61.55 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.16 | - |