Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLZX vs FSMAX
FSLZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs FSMAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp Z
Price$46.41
Change-$0.06 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.16B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
FSLZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. FSLZX (2.16B). FSLZX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FSLZX (0.74) vs FSMAX (0.46). FSLZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FSLZX (9 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FSLZX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSLZX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. FSLZX (10.25). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. FSLZX (37.79).
| FSLZX | FSMAX | FSLZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,571% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.175 | 4.478 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.16B | 39.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.46 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.25 | 21.74 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.81 | 37.63 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.79 | 51.34 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.66 | - |