Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLZX vs FSMAX
FSLZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs FSMAX
FSLZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. FSLZX (2.76B). FSLZX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FSLZX (0.54) vs FSMAX (0.49). FSLZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FSLZX (10 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FSLZX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSLZX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. FSLZX (12.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. FSLZX (14.90).
| FSLZX | FSMAX | FSLZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,714% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,714% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.450 | 13.758 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.76B | 40.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.49 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.95 | 14.25 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.08 | 65.66 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.90 | 32.77 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers