Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLZX vs FSMDX
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs FSMDX
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. FSLZX (2.54B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FSLZX: FSMDX (0.99) vs FSLZX (0.55). FSLZX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FSLZX (9 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). FSLZX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSLZX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.07 vs. FSMDX (22.95). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.87 vs. FSLZX (18.96).
| FSLZX | FSMDX | FSLZX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.303 | 13.431 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 51.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.99 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.07 | 22.95 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.49 | 59.87 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.96 | 43.87 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 178.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers