Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLZX vs FSMDX
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs FSMDX
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. FSMDX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. FSLZX (2.72B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FSLZX: FSMDX (0.76) vs FSLZX (0.54). FSLZX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FSLZX (10 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). FSLZX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSLZX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.74 vs. FSLZX (17.60). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. FSLZX (17.61).
| FSLZX | FSMDX | FSLZX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.792 | 14.622 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 52.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.76 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.60 | 18.74 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.48 | 50.09 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.61 | 42.85 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 165.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers