FSM
Price
$4.60
Change
-$0.04 (-0.86%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
HL
Price
$5.33
Change
+$0.03 (+0.57%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
56 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSM vs HL

Header iconFSM vs HL Comparison
Open Charts FSM vs HLBanner chart's image
Fortuna Mining
Price$4.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.86%)
Volume$5.99M
CapitalizationN/A
Hecla Mining
Price$5.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.57%)
Volume$11.71M
CapitalizationN/A
FSM vs HL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. HL commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a Buy and HL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FSM: $4.60 vs. HL: $5.33)
Brand notoriety: FSM: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 74% vs. HL: 99%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $1.13B vs. HL: $3.01B
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.13B. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSM and HL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.44% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.

HL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.73% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than FSM($1.14B). HL has higher P/E ratio than FSM: HL (1111.11) vs FSM (26.81). FSM YTD gains are higher at: 19.171 vs. HL (11.618). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 231M vs. HL (124M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 128M vs. HL (106M). FSM has less debt than HL: FSM (264M) vs HL (663M). FSM has higher revenues than HL: FSM (842M) vs HL (720M).
FSMHLFSM / HL
Capitalization1.14B3.01B38%
EBITDA231M124M186%
Gain YTD19.17111.618165%
P/E Ratio26.811111.112%
Revenue842M720M117%
Total Cash128M106M121%
Total Debt264M663M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
549
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7654
SMR RATING
1..100
8789
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
641
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSM's Valuation (83) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (97). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FSM (76). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's SMR Rating (87) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (89). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (61). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSM (64). This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSMHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWAGX19.82-0.09
-0.45%
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas A
MWECX41.40-0.19
-0.46%
MFS Global Equity C
RIIEX36.94-0.18
-0.48%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R2E
COHOX13.04-0.07
-0.53%
Coho Relative Value Equity
NLCAX51.45-0.29
-0.56%
Voya Large-Cap Growth A