Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs FTZCX
FSMAX vs FTZCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FTZCX
FSMAX vs FTZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. FTZCX (897M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FTZCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FTZCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FTZCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs FTZCX (5 years). FTZCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FTZCX (20.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZCX: FSMAX (0) vs FTZCX (1000). FTZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.48 vs. FSMAX (29.23). FTZCX return over 5 years is better than : 91.72 vs. FSMAX (33.65).
| FSMAX | FTZCX | FSMAX / FTZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.85 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.94 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 21.810 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 897M | 4,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 45.48 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 108.50 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 91.72 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement