Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.54
Change-$1.22 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$24.94
Change-$0.26 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. FZAMX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and FZAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. FZAMX (1.57B). FZAMX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FZAMX (0.51) vs FSMAX (0.44). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.58 vs. FZAMX (-0.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.17 vs. FZAMX (24.41).
| FSMAX | FZAMX | FSMAX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.072 | 3.661 | 357% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 1.57B | 2,637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.51 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.58 | -0.08 | -23,628% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.02 | 32.52 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.17 | 24.41 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.23 | 32.43 | 331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement