Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$79.56
Change+$7.30 (+10.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$20.71
Change+$1.74 (+9.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. FZAMX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and FZAMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. FZAMX (1.43B). FZAMX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FZAMX (0.58) vs FSMAX (0.53). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.43 vs. FZAMX (-19.37). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.83 vs. FZAMX (28.85).
| FSMAX | FZAMX | FSMAX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.497 | -20.403 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.43B | 2,560% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.58 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.43 | -19.37 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.58 | -11.33 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.83 | 28.85 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.63 | -3.82 | -1,012% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...