Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$23.89
Change-$0.06 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. FZAMX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and FZAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. FZAMX (1.52B). FZAMX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: FZAMX (0.53) vs FSMAX (0.46). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.34 vs. FZAMX (3.80). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.31 vs. FZAMX (25.21).
| FSMAX | FZAMX | FSMAX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.456 | -1.481 | -301% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 1.52B | 2,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.34 | 3.80 | 535% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.69 | 15.32 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.31 | 25.21 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.02 | 20.93 | 401% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement