Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. FZAMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and FZAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. FZAMX (2.3B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMAX (0.48) vs FZAMX (0.27). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMAX (15 years) vs FZAMX (13 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FZAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.85 vs. FSMAX (24.38). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. FZAMX (22.42).
| FSMAX | FZAMX | FSMAX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 23.703 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 2.3B | 1,890% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.27 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | 27.85 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 42.02 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | 22.42 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | 65.15 | 214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers