Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs FZAMX
FSMAX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. FZAMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and FZAMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. FZAMX (2.12B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FZAMX (0.29). FSMAX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMAX (15 years) vs FZAMX (13 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FZAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.03 vs. FSMAX (29.23). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. FZAMX (21.65).
| FSMAX | FZAMX | FSMAX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 24.271 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 2.12B | 2,014% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.29 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 34.03 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 51.05 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 21.65 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 76.36 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers