Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GMXAX
FSMAX vs GMXAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GMXAX
FSMAX vs GMXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GMXAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and GMXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. GMXAX (480M). GMXAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: GMXAX (0.64) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GMXAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs GMXAX (27 years). GMXAX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. GMXAX (15.69). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMXAX: FSMAX (0) vs GMXAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. GMXAX (7.31). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. GMXAX (-9.92).
| FSMAX | GMXAX | FSMAX / GMXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 14.207 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 480M | 8,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.64 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 7.31 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 7.94 | 703% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -9.92 | -335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 5.11 | 2,621% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement