Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSWPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.37
Change+$0.21 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P
Price$23.77
Change-$0.07 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSWPX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and GSWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. GSWPX (1.49B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSWPX: FSMAX (0.47) vs GSWPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSWPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSWPX (7 years). GSWPX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and GSWPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. GSWPX (0.63). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.51 vs. GSWPX (-1.12).
| FSMAX | GSWPX | FSMAX / GSWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.710 | -3.286 | -143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 1.49B | 2,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 0.63 | 2,895% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.76 | 29.28 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.51 | -1.12 | -5,581% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement