Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSWPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$86.92
Change-$2.39 (-2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P
Price$22.58
Change-$0.62 (-2.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSWPX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and GSWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. GSWPX (1.52B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSWPX: FSMAX (0.54) vs GSWPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSWPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSWPX (7 years). GSWPX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and GSWPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.66 vs. GSWPX (-5.23). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.82 vs. GSWPX (4.32).
| FSMAX | GSWPX | FSMAX / GSWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.728 | -5.882 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 1.52B | 2,370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.66 | -5.23 | -166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.07 | 26.64 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.82 | 4.32 | 1,571% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement