Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSWPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P
Price$23.86
Change+$0.14 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GSWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. GSWPX (1.28B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSWPX: FSMAX (0.43) vs GSWPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSWPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSWPX (8 years). GSWPX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and GSWPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. GSWPX (-7.31). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. GSWPX (-19.13).
| FSMAX | GSWPX | FSMAX / GSWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.492 | -3.773 | -172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 1.28B | 3,255% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | -7.31 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 19.50 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.53 | -19.13 | -175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers