Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSWPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.04
Change+$1.04 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P
Price$25.97
Change+$0.36 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSWPX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and GSWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. GSWPX (1.79B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSWPX: FSMAX (1.10) vs GSWPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSWPX: FSMAX (13 years) vs GSWPX (7 years). GSWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and GSWPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.28 vs. GSWPX (16.67). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.34 vs. GSWPX (18.84).
| FSMAX | GSWPX | FSMAX / GSWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.533 | 3.895 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 1.79B | 2,282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.28 | 16.67 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.87 | 14.02 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.34 | 18.84 | 288% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...