Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSWPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$76.01
Change-$3.55 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P
Price$20.16
Change-$0.72 (-3.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSWPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and GSWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. GSWPX (1.41B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSWPX: FSMAX (0.53) vs GSWPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSWPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSWPX (7 years). GSWPX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and GSWPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. GSWPX (-13.90). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.38 vs. GSWPX (11.72).
| FSMAX | GSWPX | FSMAX / GSWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.456 | -15.294 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.41B | 2,589% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | -13.90 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.74 | -3.24 | -269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.38 | 11.72 | 575% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...