Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSWPX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GSWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. GSWPX (1.13B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSWPX: FSMAX (0.49) vs GSWPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSWPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs GSWPX (8 years). GSWPX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and GSWPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. GSWPX (-0.86). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. GSWPX (-24.71).
| FSMAX | GSWPX | FSMAX / GSWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.758 | 11.549 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.13B | 3,558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.25 | -0.86 | -1,666% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.66 | 20.38 | 322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -24.71 | -133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers