Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSWPX
FSMAX vs GSWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSWPX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GSWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. GSWPX (1.2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSWPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs GSWPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSWPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs GSWPX (8 years). GSWPX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and GSWPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.82 vs. GSWPX (7.29). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.78 vs. GSWPX (-17.48).
| FSMAX | GSWPX | FSMAX / GSWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.887 | 18.103 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.2B | 3,353% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.82 | 7.29 | 286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.15 | 26.88 | 268% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.78 | -17.48 | -210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement