Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GTMRX
FSMAX vs GTMRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GTMRX
FSMAX vs GTMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GTMRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GTMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. GTMRX (1.21B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GTMRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs GTMRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GTMRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs GTMRX (19 years). GTMRX (1.54) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GTMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and GTMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. GTMRX (4.85). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. GTMRX (-22.64).
| FSMAX | GTMRX | FSMAX / GTMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.54 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 19.410 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.21B | 3,303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 4.85 | 488% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 21.50 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -22.64 | -177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | -0.82 | -16,475% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers