Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs HBMCX
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HBMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
Price$27.58
Change+$0.16 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets863.46M
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HBMCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HBMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. HBMCX (863M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HBMCX: FSMAX (1.10) vs HBMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HBMCX: FSMAX (13 years) vs HBMCX (25 years). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and HBMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.14 vs. HBMCX (9.31). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. HBMCX (-27.03).
| FSMAX | HBMCX | FSMAX / HBMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 4.154 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 863M | 4,728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 9.31 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | -22.61 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | -27.03 | -179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | -23.32 | -387% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers