Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HBMCX
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HBMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
Price$20.97
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets710.71M
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HBMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HBMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. HBMCX (711M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HBMCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs HBMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HBMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs HBMCX (26 years). HBMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and HBMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. HBMCX (-23.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. HBMCX (-45.83).
| FSMAX | HBMCX | FSMAX / HBMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.492 | -21.148 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 711M | 5,837% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | -23.57 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | -15.50 | -322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.53 | -45.83 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | -39.26 | -240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers