Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HBMCX
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HBMCX
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HBMCX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HBMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. HBMCX (691M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HBMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs HBMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HBMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HBMCX (27 years). HBMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and HBMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. HBMCX (-24.39). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. HBMCX (-53.12).
| FSMAX | HBMCX | FSMAX / HBMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.01 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.01 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | -3.153 | -537% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 691M | 5,803% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | -24.39 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | -18.85 | -386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -53.12 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | -41.45 | -324% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement