Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HBMCX
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HBMCX
FSMAX vs HBMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HBMCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and HBMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. HBMCX (675M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HBMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs HBMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HBMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HBMCX (27 years). HBMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and HBMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. HBMCX (-21.24). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. HBMCX (-51.82).
| FSMAX | HBMCX | FSMAX / HBMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.01 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.01 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 2.071 | 646% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 675M | 5,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -21.24 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | -20.20 | -276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -51.82 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | -36.94 | -362% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers