Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HFMCX
FSMAX vs HFMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HFMCX
FSMAX vs HFMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HFMCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and HFMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. HFMCX (3.34B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HFMCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs HFMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HFMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HFMCX (29 years). HFMCX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFMCX: FSMAX (0) vs HFMCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. HFMCX (-21.28). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.56 vs. HFMCX (-43.81).
| FSMAX | HFMCX | FSMAX / HFMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.698 | 4.063 | 337% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 3.34B | 1,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | -21.28 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.16 | -18.72 | -311% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.56 | -43.81 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.04 | -17.73 | -745% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement