Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HFMCX
FSMAX vs HFMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HFMCX
FSMAX vs HFMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HFMCX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and HFMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. HFMCX (3.39B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HFMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs HFMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HFMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HFMCX (29 years). HFMCX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFMCX: FSMAX (0) vs HFMCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. HFMCX (-17.38). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. HFMCX (-40.85).
| FSMAX | HFMCX | FSMAX / HFMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.344 | 9.142 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 3.39B | 1,181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | -17.38 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.27 | -11.27 | -659% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | -40.85 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.05 | -12.74 | -1,131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers