Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HIMCX
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HIMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.57
Change-$0.96 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Hartford MidCap HLS IA
Price$24.92
Change-$0.27 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets799.73M
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HIMCX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HIMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. HIMCX (800M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HIMCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs HIMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HIMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs HIMCX (28 years). HIMCX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and HIMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.62 vs. HIMCX (-6.91). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.45 vs. HIMCX (-26.72).
| FSMAX | HIMCX | FSMAX / HIMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.74 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.74 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.719 | -11.209 | -105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 800M | 5,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.62 | -6.91 | -327% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.01 | -4.18 | -1,317% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.45 | -26.72 | -249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.14 | -25.76 | -404% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement