Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs HIMCX
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HIMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$85.11
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
Hartford MidCap HLS IA
Price$26.98
Change-$0.19 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets751.65M
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HIMCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and HIMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. HIMCX (752M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HIMCX: FSMAX (0.54) vs HIMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HIMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs HIMCX (28 years). HIMCX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and HIMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.85 vs. HIMCX (-3.93). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.38 vs. HIMCX (-19.94).
| FSMAX | HIMCX | FSMAX / HIMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.73 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.73 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.349 | -4.230 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 752M | 4,787% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | -3.93 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.86 | -11.53 | -302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.38 | -19.94 | -318% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.32 | -30.37 | -205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers