Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs HIMCX
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HIMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$84.65
Change+$1.43 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Hartford MidCap HLS IA
Price$26.39
Change+$0.43 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets734.93M
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HIMCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and HIMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. HIMCX (735M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HIMCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs HIMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HIMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs HIMCX (28 years). HIMCX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and HIMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.49 vs. HIMCX (-10.45). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 102.79 vs. HIMCX (-2.98).
| FSMAX | HIMCX | FSMAX / HIMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.73 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.73 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.429 | -8.495 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 735M | 4,966% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | -10.45 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.51 | -27.95 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.79 | -2.98 | -3,449% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.37 | -33.37 | -166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...