Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HMCNX
FSMAX vs HMCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HMCNX
FSMAX vs HMCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HMCNX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and HMCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. HMCNX (209M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HMCNX: FSMAX (0.50) vs HMCNX (0.31). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HMCNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HMCNX (7 years). HMCNX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX (23.00) and HMCNX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCNX: FSMAX (0) vs HMCNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.69 vs. HMCNX (22.78). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.70 vs. HMCNX (31.64).
| FSMAX | HMCNX | FSMAX / HMCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.22 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.27 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.115 | 19.127 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 209M | 19,187% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.31 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.69 | 22.78 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.94 | 45.37 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.70 | 31.64 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement