Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HMCNX
FSMAX vs HMCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HMCNX
FSMAX vs HMCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HMCNX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HMCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. HMCNX (202M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HMCNX: FSMAX (0.49) vs HMCNX (0.30). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HMCNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HMCNX (7 years). HMCNX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX (23.00) and HMCNX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCNX: FSMAX (0) vs HMCNX (2500). HMCNX (17.77) and FSMAX (17.20) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.70 vs. HMCNX (27.31).
| FSMAX | HMCNX | FSMAX / HMCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.22 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.27 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.874 | 15.854 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 202M | 19,851% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.30 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.20 | 17.77 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.96 | 42.04 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.70 | 27.31 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement