Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HMCNX
FSMAX vs HMCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HMCNX
FSMAX vs HMCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HMCNX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and HMCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. HMCNX (207M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HMCNX: FSMAX (0.50) vs HMCNX (0.31). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HMCNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HMCNX (7 years). HMCNX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX (23.00) and HMCNX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCNX: FSMAX (0) vs HMCNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. HMCNX (24.12). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. HMCNX (26.38).
| FSMAX | HMCNX | FSMAX / HMCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.22 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.27 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.668 | 11.938 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 207M | 20,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.31 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.51 | 24.12 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.53 | 40.76 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.00 | 26.38 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers