Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HMCNX
FSMAX vs HMCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HMCNX
FSMAX vs HMCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HMCNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and HMCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. HMCNX (223M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HMCNX: FSMAX (0.50) vs HMCNX (0.31). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HMCNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HMCNX (7 years). HMCNX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX (23.00) and HMCNX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCNX: FSMAX (0) vs HMCNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. HMCNX (25.84). FSMAX (33.65) and HMCNX (32.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMAX | HMCNX | FSMAX / HMCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.22 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.27 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 15.340 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 223M | 19,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.31 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 25.84 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 44.58 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 32.22 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers