Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HMDCX
FSMAX vs HMDCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HMDCX
FSMAX vs HMDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HMDCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and HMDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. HMDCX (3.58B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HMDCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs HMDCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HMDCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HMDCX (28 years). HMDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HMDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMDCX: FSMAX (0) vs HMDCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. HMDCX (-15.10). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. HMDCX (-52.30).
| FSMAX | HMDCX | FSMAX / HMDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.91 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.91 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 8.892 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 3.58B | 1,191% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -15.10 | -194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | -13.52 | -546% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -52.30 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | -39.90 | -385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers