Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IGRFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$30.93
Change+$0.22 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.09B
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IGRFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IGRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. IGRFX (6.09B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IGRFX: FSMAX (1.10) vs IGRFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IGRFX: FSMAX (13 years) vs IGRFX (10 years). IGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and IGRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.14 vs. IGRFX (2.69). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. IGRFX (-1.28).
| FSMAX | IGRFX | FSMAX / IGRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 3.827 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 6.09B | 670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 2.69 | 972% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | -18.37 | -116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | -1.28 | -3,790% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | 33.20 | 272% |