Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IGRFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.53
Change+$1.56 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$31.83
Change-$0.37 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.63B
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IGRFX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IGRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. IGRFX (4.63B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IGRFX: FSMAX (0.44) vs IGRFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IGRFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs IGRFX (11 years). IGRFX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and IGRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.62 vs. IGRFX (2.68). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.45 vs. IGRFX (-10.23).
| FSMAX | IGRFX | FSMAX / IGRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.86 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.719 | 8.090 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 4.63B | 886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.62 | 2.68 | 845% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.01 | 3.70 | 1,485% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.45 | -10.23 | -650% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.14 | 39.94 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers