Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IGRFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.35
Change+$0.18 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$30.38
Change+$0.20 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.95B
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IGRFX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and IGRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. IGRFX (4.95B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IGRFX: FSMAX (0.50) vs IGRFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IGRFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs IGRFX (11 years). IGRFX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and IGRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. IGRFX (-3.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.96 vs. IGRFX (-8.21).
| FSMAX | IGRFX | FSMAX / IGRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.86 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.618 | 1.309 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 4.95B | 760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | -3.02 | -515% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.97 | 2.90 | 1,690% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.96 | -8.21 | -815% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.60 | 22.19 | 341% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers