Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IGRFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.72
Change+$1.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$31.61
Change+$0.42 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.42B
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IGRFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and IGRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. IGRFX (4.42B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IGRFX: FSMAX (0.44) vs IGRFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IGRFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs IGRFX (11 years). IGRFX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and IGRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. IGRFX (-4.47). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.18 vs. IGRFX (-21.51).
| FSMAX | IGRFX | FSMAX / IGRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.86 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.730 | 4.700 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 4.42B | 937% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | -4.47 | -399% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.00 | 7.70 | 883% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | -21.51 | -233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.77 | 36.74 | 285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement