Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IGRFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.19
Change-$2.88 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.92B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$29.74
Change-$0.80 (-2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.67B
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IGRFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IGRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. IGRFX (5.67B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IGRFX: FSMAX (1.10) vs IGRFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IGRFX: FSMAX (13 years) vs IGRFX (11 years). IGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and IGRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.39 vs. IGRFX (-6.62). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.45 vs. IGRFX (-6.57).
| FSMAX | IGRFX | FSMAX / IGRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | -0.168 | -203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 5.67B | 739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | -6.62 | -232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.35 | -15.13 | -161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | -6.57 | -631% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 20.31 | 355% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...