Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IGRFX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IGRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. IGRFX (2.8B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IGRFX: FSMAX (0.48) vs IGRFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IGRFX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IGRFX (12 years). IGRFX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and IGRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.22 vs. IGRFX (-10.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. IGRFX (-40.29).
| FSMAX | IGRFX | FSMAX / IGRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.423 | 0.253 | 5,701% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 2.8B | 1,554% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.22 | -10.95 | -194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.43 | -15.30 | -388% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | -40.29 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.18 | 27.95 | 480% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers