Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IGRFX
FSMAX vs IGRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IGRFX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and IGRFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. IGRFX (2.88B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IGRFX: FSMAX (0.50) vs IGRFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IGRFX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IGRFX (12 years). IGRFX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and IGRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.60 vs. IGRFX (-7.91). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. IGRFX (-37.55).
| FSMAX | IGRFX | FSMAX / IGRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.519 | 5.566 | 351% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.88B | 1,394% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.60 | -7.91 | -298% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.81 | -5.59 | -1,266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.00 | -37.55 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.28 | 31.75 | 442% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement