Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IMCGX
FSMAX vs IMCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IMCGX
FSMAX vs IMCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IMCGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and IMCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. IMCGX (131M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IMCGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs IMCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IMCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IMCGX (13 years). IMCGX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs IMCGX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. IMCGX (-20.79). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. IMCGX (-40.36).
| FSMAX | IMCGX | FSMAX / IMCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.95 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 4.514 | 296% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 131M | 30,611% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -20.79 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 9.85 | 649% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -40.36 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | -20.70 | -644% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers