Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IMCGX
FSMAX vs IMCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IMCGX
FSMAX vs IMCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IMCGX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and IMCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. IMCGX (139M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IMCGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs IMCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IMCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IMCGX (13 years). IMCGX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs IMCGX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.37 vs. IMCGX (-15.56). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.93 vs. IMCGX (-34.66).
| FSMAX | IMCGX | FSMAX / IMCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.92 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.95 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.019 | 9.954 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 139M | 31,295% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.37 | -15.56 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.83 | 15.85 | 415% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.93 | -34.66 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.98 | -16.50 | -848% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers