Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IMIDX
FSMAX vs IMIDX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IMIDX
FSMAX vs IMIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IMIDX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IMIDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. IMIDX (381M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IMIDX: FSMAX (0.48) vs IMIDX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IMIDX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IMIDX (14 years). IMIDX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IMIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMIDX: FSMAX (0) vs IMIDX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. IMIDX (-2.05). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.59 vs. IMIDX (-33.73).
| FSMAX | IMIDX | FSMAX / IMIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.82 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.82 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 14.966 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 381M | 11,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.67 | -2.05 | -1,252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.76 | -12.64 | -544% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.59 | -33.73 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.51 | 41.59 | 360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers