Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IMIDX
FSMAX vs IMIDX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IMIDX
FSMAX vs IMIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IMIDX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IMIDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. IMIDX (384M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IMIDX: FSMAX (0.50) vs IMIDX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IMIDX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IMIDX (14 years). IMIDX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IMIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMIDX: FSMAX (0) vs IMIDX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.51 vs. IMIDX (1.47). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. IMIDX (-34.33).
| FSMAX | IMIDX | FSMAX / IMIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.82 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.82 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.039 | 19.519 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 384M | 10,443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.51 | 1.47 | 1,672% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.02 | -5.81 | -1,273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.46 | -34.33 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.54 | 41.90 | 331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement