Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IMOWX
FSMAX vs IMOWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IMOWX
FSMAX vs IMOWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IMOWX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IMOWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. IMOWX (760M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IMOWX: FSMAX (0.50) vs IMOWX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IMOWX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IMOWX (17 years). IMOWX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IMOWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMOWX: FSMAX (0) vs IMOWX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. IMOWX (-7.04). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. IMOWX (-23.10).
| FSMAX | IMOWX | FSMAX / IMOWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 8.435 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 760M | 5,276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | -7.04 | -337% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 12.76 | 570% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -23.10 | -174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | -2.79 | -4,820% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers