Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IMOWX
FSMAX vs IMOWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IMOWX
FSMAX vs IMOWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IMOWX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and IMOWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. IMOWX (755M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IMOWX: FSMAX (0.50) vs IMOWX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IMOWX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IMOWX (17 years). IMOWX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IMOWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMOWX: FSMAX (0) vs IMOWX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. IMOWX (-11.05). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. IMOWX (-25.51).
| FSMAX | IMOWX | FSMAX / IMOWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 6.044 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 755M | 5,311% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -11.05 | -186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 3.84 | 1,453% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -25.51 | -130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | -3.37 | -3,970% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers