Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IMOZX
FSMAX vs IMOZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IMOZX
FSMAX vs IMOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IMOZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and IMOZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. IMOZX (594M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IMOZX: FSMAX (0.50) vs IMOZX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IMOZX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IMOZX (13 years). IMOZX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IMOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMOZX: FSMAX (0) vs IMOZX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. IMOZX (-2.50). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. IMOZX (-18.33).
| FSMAX | IMOZX | FSMAX / IMOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.83 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.87 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 9.003 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 594M | 7,189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -2.50 | -1,171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 15.81 | 467% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -18.33 | -184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 10.45 | 1,469% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers