Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IRMCX
FSMAX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IRMCX
FSMAX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IRMCX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and IRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. IRMCX (770M). IRMCX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: IRMCX (0.75) vs FSMAX (0.48). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IRMCX (18 years). IRMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.75 vs. IRMCX (-15.92). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. IRMCX (-32.01).
| FSMAX | IRMCX | FSMAX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.380 | -17.725 | -75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 770M | 5,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.75 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.75 | -15.92 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.72 | -14.28 | -404% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -32.01 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.39 | -32.32 | -406% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers