Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IRMCX
FSMAX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IRMCX
FSMAX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IRMCX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and IRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. IRMCX (808M). IRMCX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: IRMCX (0.75) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IRMCX (18 years). IRMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. IRMCX (-11.16). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. IRMCX (-29.55).
| FSMAX | IRMCX | FSMAX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.344 | -13.311 | -153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 808M | 4,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | -11.16 | -232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.27 | -6.02 | -1,234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | -29.55 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.05 | -28.54 | -505% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers