Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IRMCX
FSMAX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IRMCX
FSMAX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IRMCX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IRMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. IRMCX (711M). IRMCX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: IRMCX (0.75) vs FSMAX (0.48). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IRMCX (18 years). IRMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. IRMCX (-13.37). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.59 vs. IRMCX (-31.38).
| FSMAX | IRMCX | FSMAX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | -16.598 | -102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 711M | 6,118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.75 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.67 | -13.37 | -192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.76 | -10.38 | -662% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.59 | -31.38 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.51 | -28.63 | -522% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers