Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IRMTX
FSMAX vs IRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IRMTX
FSMAX vs IRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IRMTX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and IRMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. IRMTX (775M). IRMTX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: IRMTX (1.12) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IRMTX: FSMAX (15 years) vs IRMTX (17 years). IRMTX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). IRMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and IRMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. IRMTX (-15.87). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. IRMTX (-34.15).
| FSMAX | IRMTX | FSMAX / IRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.80 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | -18.466 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 775M | 5,174% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.12 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -15.87 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | -16.01 | -349% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -34.15 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | -34.45 | -388% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers