Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs JACNX
FSMAX vs JACNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs JACNX
FSMAX vs JACNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. JACNX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and JACNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. JACNX (5.49B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than JACNX: FSMAX (0.50) vs JACNX (0.18). FSMAX was incepted earlier than JACNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs JACNX (26 years). JACNX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). JACNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACNX: FSMAX (0) vs JACNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. JACNX (4.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. JACNX (-2.11).
| FSMAX | JACNX | FSMAX / JACNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 14.019 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 5.49B | 731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.18 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 4.13 | 498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 11.69 | 477% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -2.11 | -1,573% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 82.02 | 163% |