Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs JACNX
FSMAX vs JACNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs JACNX
FSMAX vs JACNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. JACNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and JACNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. JACNX (5.04B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than JACNX: FSMAX (0.50) vs JACNX (0.19). FSMAX was incepted earlier than JACNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs JACNX (27 years). JACNX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). JACNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACNX: FSMAX (0) vs JACNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. JACNX (9.87). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. JACNX (3.37).
| FSMAX | JACNX | FSMAX / JACNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 19.612 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 5.04B | 796% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.19 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 9.87 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 26.05 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | 3.37 | 1,190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 79.57 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement