Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs JMGPX
FSMAX vs JMGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs JMGPX
FSMAX vs JMGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. JMGPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and JMGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. JMGPX (12.8B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than JMGPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs JMGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than JMGPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs JMGPX (10 years). JMGPX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). JMGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and JMGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. JMGPX (2.31). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. JMGPX (-6.02).
| FSMAX | JMGPX | FSMAX / JMGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.21 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 6.732 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 12.8B | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 2.31 | 1,264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 23.73 | 311% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -6.02 | -559% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers