Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs JMGPX
FSMAX vs JMGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs JMGPX
FSMAX vs JMGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. JMGPX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and JMGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. JMGPX (12.1B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than JMGPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs JMGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than JMGPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs JMGPX (10 years). JMGPX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). JMGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and JMGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. JMGPX (-8.12). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. JMGPX (-12.13).
| FSMAX | JMGPX | FSMAX / JMGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.21 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 1.783 | 750% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 12.1B | 331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -8.12 | -253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 11.69 | 478% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -12.13 | -274% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers