Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs JMGPX
FSMAX vs JMGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs JMGPX
FSMAX vs JMGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. JMGPX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and JMGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. JMGPX (11.6B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than JMGPX: FSMAX (0.49) vs JMGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than JMGPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs JMGPX (10 years). JMGPX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). JMGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and JMGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. JMGPX (-12.84). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.57 vs. JMGPX (-16.03).
| FSMAX | JMGPX | FSMAX / JMGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.21 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.490 | -0.482 | -2,796% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 11.6B | 346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -12.84 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.71 | 15.73 | 424% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.57 | -16.03 | -203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.27 | 74.26 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement