Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs JMGZX
FSMAX vs JMGZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs JMGZX
FSMAX vs JMGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. JMGZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and JMGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. JMGZX (12.8B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than JMGZX: FSMAX (0.50) vs JMGZX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than JMGZX: FSMAX (15 years) vs JMGZX (17 years). JMGZX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). JMGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and JMGZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. JMGZX (1.04). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. JMGZX (-9.46).
| FSMAX | JMGZX | FSMAX / JMGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.40 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 6.600 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 12.8B | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 1.04 | 2,804% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 20.76 | 356% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -9.46 | -356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 82.35 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers