Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs JMGZX
FSMAX vs JMGZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs JMGZX
FSMAX vs JMGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. JMGZX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and JMGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. JMGZX (12.1B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than JMGZX: FSMAX (0.50) vs JMGZX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than JMGZX: FSMAX (15 years) vs JMGZX (17 years). JMGZX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). JMGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and JMGZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. JMGZX (-9.26). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. JMGZX (-15.32).
| FSMAX | JMGZX | FSMAX / JMGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.40 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 1.638 | 816% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 12.1B | 331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -9.26 | -222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 9.01 | 620% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -15.32 | -217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 65.20 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers