Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KMKAX
FSMAX vs KMKAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMKAX
FSMAX vs KMKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMKAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and KMKAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. KMKAX (293M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMKAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs KMKAX (0.09). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMKAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs KMKAX (21 years). KMKAX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. KMKAX (4.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKAX: FSMAX (0) vs KMKAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. KMKAX (5.76). KMKAX return over 5 years is better than : 98.73 vs. FSMAX (33.18).
| FSMAX | KMKAX | FSMAX / KMKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.65 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.93 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 14.254 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 293M | 13,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.09 | 548% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 5.76 | 357% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 123.85 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | 98.73 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 435.87 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers