Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs KMKCX
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMKCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.78
Change+$0.62 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Kinetics Market Opportunities Adv C
Price$77.17
Change+$0.68 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.28M
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMKCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and KMKCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. KMKCX (346M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMKCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs KMKCX (0.11). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMKCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs KMKCX (18 years). KMKCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. KMKCX (5.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKCX: FSMAX (0) vs KMKCX (2500). KMKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 70.95 vs. FSMAX (0.35). KMKCX return over 5 years is better than : 256.52 vs. FSMAX (60.85).
| FSMAX | KMKCX | FSMAX / KMKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.51 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.097 | 7.490 | -202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 346M | 10,549% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.11 | 464% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | 70.95 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.53 | 95.29 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.85 | 256.52 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.71 | 356.18 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers