Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KMKCX
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMKCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Kinetics Market Opportunities Adv C
Price$70.03
Change-$0.92 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.92M
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMKCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and KMKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. KMKCX (286M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMKCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs KMKCX (0.12). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMKCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs KMKCX (19 years). KMKCX (2.47) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. KMKCX (7.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKCX: FSMAX (0) vs KMKCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. KMKCX (-13.53). KMKCX return over 5 years is better than : 180.04 vs. FSMAX (33.53).
| FSMAX | KMKCX | FSMAX / KMKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.47 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.492 | -0.295 | -2,200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 286M | 14,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.12 | 356% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | -13.53 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 51.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.53 | 180.04 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | 364.13 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers