Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KMKCX
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMKCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.72
Change+$1.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Kinetics Market Opportunities Adv C
Price$76.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.66M
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMKCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and KMKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. KMKCX (312M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMKCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs KMKCX (0.12). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMKCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs KMKCX (19 years). KMKCX (2.47) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. KMKCX (7.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKCX: FSMAX (0) vs KMKCX (2500). KMKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.01 vs. FSMAX (17.85). KMKCX return over 5 years is better than : 245.58 vs. FSMAX (50.18).
| FSMAX | KMKCX | FSMAX / KMKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.47 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.730 | 7.673 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 312M | 13,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.12 | 361% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | 27.01 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.00 | 96.18 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | 245.58 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.77 | 399.92 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement