Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KMKCX
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMKCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.67
Change-$0.21 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Kinetics Market Opportunities Adv C
Price$70.95
Change-$0.31 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets288.01M
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMKCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and KMKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. KMKCX (288M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMKCX: FSMAX (0.46) vs KMKCX (0.12). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMKCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs KMKCX (18 years). KMKCX (2.47) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. KMKCX (7.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKCX: FSMAX (0) vs KMKCX (2500). KMKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.64 vs. FSMAX (18.48). KMKCX return over 5 years is better than : 200.25 vs. FSMAX (51.23).
| FSMAX | KMKCX | FSMAX / KMKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.47 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.401 | 0.141 | 3,132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 288M | 13,750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.12 | 381% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.48 | 32.64 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.75 | 89.67 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.23 | 200.25 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.14 | 349.78 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers