Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KMKCX
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMKCX
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMKCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and KMKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. KMKCX (292M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMKCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs KMKCX (0.10). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMKCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs KMKCX (19 years). KMKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. KMKCX (4.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKCX: FSMAX (0) vs KMKCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. KMKCX (1.57). KMKCX return over 5 years is better than : 100.84 vs. FSMAX (39.12).
| FSMAX | KMKCX | FSMAX / KMKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.43 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 13.290 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 292M | 14,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.10 | 505% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | 1.57 | 1,550% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 126.91 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | 100.84 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | 400.11 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement