Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KMKCX
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMKCX
FSMAX vs KMKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMKCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and KMKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. KMKCX (276M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMKCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs KMKCX (0.10). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMKCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs KMKCX (19 years). KMKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. KMKCX (4.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKCX: FSMAX (0) vs KMKCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. KMKCX (-3.46). KMKCX return over 5 years is better than : 81.29 vs. FSMAX (33.65).
| FSMAX | KMKCX | FSMAX / KMKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.43 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 6.395 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 276M | 15,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.10 | 518% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -3.46 | -844% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 121.48 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 81.29 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 379.24 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers