Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KMKNX
FSMAX vs KMKNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMKNX
FSMAX vs KMKNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMKNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and KMKNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. KMKNX (292M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMKNX: FSMAX (0.48) vs KMKNX (0.14). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMKNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs KMKNX (20 years). KMKNX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. KMKNX (4.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKNX: FSMAX (0) vs KMKNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. KMKNX (2.38). KMKNX return over 5 years is better than : 108.30 vs. FSMAX (39.12).
| FSMAX | KMKNX | FSMAX / KMKNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.40 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.68 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 13.740 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 292M | 14,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.14 | 337% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | 2.38 | 1,024% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 132.09 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | 108.30 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | 440.37 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers