Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KMKNX
FSMAX vs KMKNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMKNX
FSMAX vs KMKNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMKNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and KMKNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. KMKNX (276M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMKNX: FSMAX (0.50) vs KMKNX (0.15). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMKNX: FSMAX (15 years) vs KMKNX (20 years). KMKNX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. KMKNX (4.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKNX: FSMAX (0) vs KMKNX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. KMKNX (-2.71). KMKNX return over 5 years is better than : 88.04 vs. FSMAX (33.65).
| FSMAX | KMKNX | FSMAX / KMKNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.40 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.68 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 6.768 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 276M | 15,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.15 | 345% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -2.71 | -1,080% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 126.58 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 88.04 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 417.84 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement