Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KMVAX
FSMAX vs KMVAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KMVAX
FSMAX vs KMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KMVAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and KMVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. KMVAX (109M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KMVAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs KMVAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KMVAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs KMVAX (28 years). KMVAX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. KMVAX (10.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMVAX: FSMAX (0) vs KMVAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. KMVAX (3.55). KMVAX (41.73) and FSMAX (40.14) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMAX | KMVAX | FSMAX / KMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.25 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 11.345 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 109M | 36,789% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 3.55 | 667% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 47.90 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | 41.73 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 70.79 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers