Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KNPAX
FSMAX vs KNPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KNPAX
FSMAX vs KNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KNPAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and KNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. KNPAX (1.04B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KNPAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs KNPAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KNPAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs KNPAX (25 years). KNPAX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. KNPAX (3.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KNPAX: FSMAX (0) vs KNPAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. KNPAX (-13.70). KNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.50 vs. FSMAX (33.65).
| FSMAX | KNPAX | FSMAX / KNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.89 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.89 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 11.429 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.04B | 4,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -13.70 | -213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 78.42 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 40.50 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 255.13 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers