Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs KNPAX
FSMAX vs KNPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs KNPAX
FSMAX vs KNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. KNPAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and KNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. KNPAX (1.12B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than KNPAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs KNPAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than KNPAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs KNPAX (25 years). KNPAX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. KNPAX (3.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KNPAX: FSMAX (0) vs KNPAX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. KNPAX (7.30). KNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.13 vs. FSMAX (40.14).
| FSMAX | KNPAX | FSMAX / KNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.89 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.89 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 22.707 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.12B | 3,584% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 7.30 | 324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 56.84 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | 67.13 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 274.80 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers