Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LACAX
FSMAX vs LACAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LACAX
FSMAX vs LACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LACAX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LACAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LACAX (2.31B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LACAX: FSMAX (0.49) vs LACAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LACAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LACAX (26 years). LACAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: FSMAX (0) vs LACAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. LACAX (4.22). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.42 vs. LACAX (-31.34).
| FSMAX | LACAX | FSMAX / LACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.08 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.10 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.506 | 2.125 | 588% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.31B | 1,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 4.22 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.66 | 31.37 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.42 | -31.34 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.58 | -43.74 | -294% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement