Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LACAX
FSMAX vs LACAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LACAX
FSMAX vs LACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LACAX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LACAX (2.55B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LACAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LACAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LACAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LACAX (26 years). LACAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: FSMAX (0) vs LACAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.02 vs. LACAX (19.14). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.53 vs. LACAX (-22.80).
| FSMAX | LACAX | FSMAX / LACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.08 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.10 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.774 | 11.409 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.55B | 1,573% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.02 | 19.14 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.94 | 40.48 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.53 | -22.80 | -169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.78 | -39.10 | -360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers