Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LBGCX
FSMAX vs LBGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LBGCX
FSMAX vs LBGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LBGCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and LBGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. LBGCX (285M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LBGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LBGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LBGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LBGCX (16 years). LBGCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LBGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LBGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. LBGCX (0.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. LBGCX (8.69).
| FSMAX | LBGCX | FSMAX / LBGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.99 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.668 | 5.729 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 285M | 14,982% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.51 | 0.08 | 37,125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.53 | 33.16 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.00 | 8.69 | 426% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.36 | 67.15 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers