Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LCLAX
FSMAX vs LCLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LCLAX
FSMAX vs LCLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LCLAX commentary
Aug 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LCLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LCLAX (3.31B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LCLAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LCLAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LCLAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LCLAX (13 years). LCLAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCLAX: FSMAX (0) vs LCLAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.31 vs. LCLAX (10.84). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.79 vs. LCLAX (14.82).
| FSMAX | LCLAX | FSMAX / LCLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.34 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.39 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.344 | 8.552 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 3.31B | 1,212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.31 | 10.84 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.42 | 54.66 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.79 | 14.82 | 302% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.19 | 311.94 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement