Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LCMRX
FSMAX vs LCMRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LCMRX
FSMAX vs LCMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LCMRX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LCMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LCMRX (257M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LCMRX: FSMAX (0.49) vs LCMRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LCMRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LCMRX (13 years). LCMRX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LCMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and LCMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.95 vs. LCMRX (-12.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.70 vs. LCMRX (-9.43).
| FSMAX | LCMRX | FSMAX / LCMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.59 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.983 | -0.699 | -1,857% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 257M | 15,603% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.95 | -12.57 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.80 | 30.10 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.70 | -9.43 | -347% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.89 | 65.54 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement