Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LLSCX
FSMAX vs LLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LLSCX
FSMAX vs LLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LLSCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. LLSCX (641M). LLSCX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: LLSCX (1.24) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LLSCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LLSCX (37 years). LLSCX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLSCX: FSMAX (0) vs LLSCX (10000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. LLSCX (-4.20). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. LLSCX (2.72).
| FSMAX | LLSCX | FSMAX / LLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.95 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | -7.356 | -210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 641M | 6,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.24 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -4.20 | -695% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 25.15 | 294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 2.72 | 1,235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 7.41 | 2,072% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers