Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.19
Change-$2.88 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.92B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities A
Price$25.57
Change-$1.17 (-4.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets539.83M
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. LMGAX (540M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (1.10) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (13 years) vs LMGAX (30 years). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). LMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.37 vs. FSMAX (15.39). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.45 vs. LMGAX (0.20).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | 0.868 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 540M | 7,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | 19.37 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.35 | 20.73 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | 0.20 | 21,154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 17.08 | 422% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...