Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.46
Change-$0.29 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities A
Price$29.09
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets660.87M
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. LMGAX (661M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (0.46) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGAX (30 years). LMGAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). LMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.30 vs. FSMAX (16.65). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.87 vs. LMGAX (5.55).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.140 | 14.753 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 661M | 5,991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.65 | 35.30 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.54 | 39.25 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.87 | 5.55 | 952% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.94 | 27.59 | 308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement