Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.49
Change+$1.11 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities A
Price$29.58
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets674.31M
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. LMGAX (674M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (0.44) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGAX (30 years). LMGAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). LMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.46 vs. FSMAX (21.50). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.13 vs. LMGAX (7.64).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | 16.686 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 674M | 6,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.50 | 40.46 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.89 | 58.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.13 | 7.64 | 774% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.70 | 37.13 | 274% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement