Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities A
Price$26.53
Change+$0.14 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets554.33M
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. LMGAX (554M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (1.10) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (13 years) vs LMGAX (29 years). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). LMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.77 vs. FSMAX (26.14). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. LMGAX (5.49).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 4.655 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 554M | 7,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 35.77 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | 18.54 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | 5.49 | 882% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | 31.47 | 287% |