Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$79.49
Change+$1.44 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities A
Price$22.04
Change+$0.69 (+3.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.65M
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and LMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. LMGAX (479M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (0.53) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGAX (30 years). LMGAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). LMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.18 vs. FSMAX (-1.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. LMGAX (-1.16).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.16 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.118 | -15.779 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 479M | 7,620% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | 1.18 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.08 | 5.43 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.03 | -1.16 | -5,446% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.70 | -5.32 | -859% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers