Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.09
Change+$0.88 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities A
Price$27.59
Change+$0.33 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets628.06M
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and LMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. LMGAX (628M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (0.47) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGAX (30 years). LMGAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). LMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.24 vs. FSMAX (18.61). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.88 vs. LMGAX (6.90).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.632 | 8.836 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 628M | 6,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.61 | 25.24 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.62 | 52.18 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | 6.90 | 941% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.19 | 23.56 | 345% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement