Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. LMGAX (833M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LMGAX (31 years). LMGAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. LMGAX (20.75). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. LMGAX (4.90).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.11 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 21.297 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 833M | 5,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 20.75 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 71.53 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 4.90 | 687% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 78.43 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers