Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGAX
FSMAX vs LMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LMGAX (779M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LMGAX (31 years). LMGAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. LMGAX (-0.11). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. LMGAX (-9.94).
| FSMAX | LMGAX | FSMAX / LMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.11 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 6.712 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 779M | 5,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -0.11 | -19,532% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 43.66 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -9.94 | -334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 49.71 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers