Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.35
Change+$0.25 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$15.42
Change-$0.20 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets629.92M
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and LMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. LMGCX (630M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (0.47) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGCX (27 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.17 vs. FSMAX (17.37). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.84 vs. LMGCX (-15.80).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.90 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.543 | 8.774 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 630M | 6,222% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.37 | 24.17 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.15 | 44.90 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.84 | -15.80 | -398% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.02 | -14.64 | -540% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement