Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.03
Change+$1.79 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$16.04
Change-$0.12 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets652.43M
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. LMGCX (652M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (0.46) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGCX (27 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.02 vs. FSMAX (16.04). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.80 vs. LMGCX (-19.78).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.90 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.597 | 9.889 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 652M | 6,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.04 | 40.02 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 34.53 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.80 | -19.78 | -247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.74 | -13.91 | -580% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement