Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$78.74
Change-$5.91 (-6.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$11.86
Change-$0.91 (-7.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.85M
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. LMGCX (508M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGCX (26 years). LMGCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. LMGCX (1.35). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 106.28 vs. LMGCX (-1.47).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.91 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.855 | -11.072 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 508M | 7,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 1.35 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.54 | -1.77 | -483% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.28 | -1.47 | -7,249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.10 | -29.29 | -195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...