Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$81.64
Change+$0.15 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$13.09
Change+$0.20 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets519.31M
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and LMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. LMGCX (519M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGCX (27 years). LMGCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.81 vs. FSMAX (4.25). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 70.53 vs. LMGCX (-13.82).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.91 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.167 | -8.844 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 519M | 7,033% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 8.81 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.92 | 13.83 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.53 | -13.82 | -510% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.62 | -28.08 | -191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers