Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.19
Change-$2.88 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.92B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$14.47
Change-$0.66 (-4.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets539.83M
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. LMGCX (540M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (1.10) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (13 years) vs LMGCX (26 years). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.51 vs. FSMAX (15.39). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.45 vs. LMGCX (-19.48).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | 0.766 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 540M | 7,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | 18.51 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.35 | 18.03 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | -19.48 | -213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | -19.07 | -378% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...