Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.57
Change-$0.96 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$17.26
Change-$0.09 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets699.14M
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. LMGCX (699M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGCX (27 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.31 vs. FSMAX (21.46). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.88 vs. LMGCX (-8.58).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.90 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.662 | 20.195 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 699M | 5,866% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.46 | 39.31 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.55 | 56.91 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | -8.58 | -756% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | -2.04 | -5,003% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement