Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$89.35
Change-$0.75 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$14.96
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets603.67M
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and LMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. LMGCX (604M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LMGCX (27 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.10 vs. FSMAX (13.40). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.29 vs. LMGCX (-15.88).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.90 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.858 | 4.735 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 604M | 6,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.40 | 21.10 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.90 | 51.61 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.29 | -15.88 | -361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.08 | -19.10 | -351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement