Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. LMGCX (833M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LMGCX (28 years). LMGCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. LMGCX (12.22). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. LMGCX (-15.57).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.86 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.556 | 19.220 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 833M | 5,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.47 | 12.22 | 249% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.03 | 55.65 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | -15.57 | -226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.75 | 18.21 | 844% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers