Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMGCX
FSMAX vs LMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LMGCX (758M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: FSMAX (0.49) vs LMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LMGCX (28 years). LMGCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. LMGCX (-15.27). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. LMGCX (-29.80).
| FSMAX | LMGCX | FSMAX / LMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.86 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 4.255 | 314% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 758M | 5,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -15.27 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 37.77 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -29.80 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | 0.89 | 14,953% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement