Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMNOX
FSMAX vs LMNOX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMNOX
FSMAX vs LMNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMNOX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LMNOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. LMNOX (1.96B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMNOX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LMNOX (0.14). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMNOX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LMNOX (26 years). LMNOX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMNOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNOX: FSMAX (0) vs LMNOX (1000000). LMNOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.00 vs. FSMAX (30.47). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. LMNOX (10.12).
| FSMAX | LMNOX | FSMAX / LMNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.39 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.556 | 7.436 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.96B | 2,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.14 | 356% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.47 | 35.00 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.03 | 102.78 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | 10.12 | 348% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.75 | 265.08 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers