Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LMNOX
FSMAX vs LMNOX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LMNOX
FSMAX vs LMNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LMNOX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LMNOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LMNOX (2.12B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LMNOX: FSMAX (0.49) vs LMNOX (0.13). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LMNOX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LMNOX (26 years). LMNOX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LMNOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNOX: FSMAX (0) vs LMNOX (1000000). LMNOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.13 vs. FSMAX (18.31). LMNOX return over 5 years is better than : 33.21 vs. FSMAX (31.17).
| FSMAX | LMNOX | FSMAX / LMNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.39 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.960 | 17.333 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.12B | 1,893% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.13 | 374% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.31 | 25.13 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.42 | 110.62 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.17 | 33.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.51 | 227.44 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement