Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LOMGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.46
Change-$0.29 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F3
Price$36.43
Change+$0.10 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets660.87M
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LOMGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LOMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. LOMGX (661M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LOMGX: FSMAX (0.46) vs LOMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LOMGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LOMGX (8 years). LOMGX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LOMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and LOMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.78 vs. FSMAX (16.65). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.87 vs. LOMGX (13.24).
| FSMAX | LOMGX | FSMAX / LOMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.59 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.78 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.140 | 14.994 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 661M | 5,991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.65 | 35.78 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.54 | 40.66 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.87 | 13.24 | 399% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers