Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LOMGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F3
Price$33.16
Change+$0.18 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets554.33M
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LOMGX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LOMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. LOMGX (554M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LOMGX: FSMAX (1.10) vs LOMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LOMGX: FSMAX (13 years) vs LOMGX (8 years). LOMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and LOMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.29 vs. FSMAX (26.14). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. LOMGX (13.17).
| FSMAX | LOMGX | FSMAX / LOMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 4.672 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 554M | 7,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 36.29 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | 19.75 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | 13.17 | 367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | N/A | - |