Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LOMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LOMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LOMGX (758M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LOMGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs LOMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LOMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LOMGX (9 years). LOMGX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LOMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and LOMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. LOMGX (-7.49). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. LOMGX (-7.49).
| FSMAX | LOMGX | FSMAX / LOMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.62 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.77 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 5.034 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 758M | 5,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -7.49 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 53.73 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -7.49 | -437% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers