Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LOMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and LOMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. LOMGX (829M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LOMGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs LOMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LOMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LOMGX (9 years). LOMGX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LOMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and LOMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. LOMGX (15.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. LOMGX (7.17).
| FSMAX | LOMGX | FSMAX / LOMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.62 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.77 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 15.308 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 829M | 5,247% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | 15.48 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 58.01 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | 7.17 | 546% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement