Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LOMGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LOMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LOMGX (797M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LOMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LOMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LOMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LOMGX (9 years). LOMGX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LOMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and LOMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. LOMGX (4.38). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. LOMGX (-0.64).
| FSMAX | LOMGX | FSMAX / LOMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.62 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.77 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 10.068 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 797M | 5,031% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 4.38 | 540% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 66.70 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -0.64 | -6,294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers