Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LOMGX
FSMAX vs LOMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LOMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LOMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. LOMGX (833M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LOMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LOMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LOMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LOMGX (9 years). LOMGX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LOMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and LOMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. LOMGX (22.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. LOMGX (11.20).
| FSMAX | LOMGX | FSMAX / LOMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.62 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.77 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 19.812 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 833M | 5,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 22.48 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 73.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 11.20 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers