Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LSHCX
FSMAX vs LSHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LSHCX
FSMAX vs LSHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LSHCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LSHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. LSHCX (33.6M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LSHCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LSHCX (0.14). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LSHCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LSHCX (19 years). LSHCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSHCX (4.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSHCX: FSMAX (0) vs LSHCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. LSHCX (7.74). LSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.54 vs. FSMAX (33.18).
| FSMAX | LSHCX | FSMAX / LSHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.45 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 33.937 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 33.6M | 119,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.14 | 358% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 7.74 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 54.16 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | 46.54 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 221.16 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers