Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LSHCX
FSMAX vs LSHCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LSHCX
FSMAX vs LSHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LSHCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LSHCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. LSHCX (30.6M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LSHCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LSHCX (0.14). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LSHCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs LSHCX (19 years). LSHCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSHCX (4.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSHCX: FSMAX (0) vs LSHCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. LSHCX (-8.99). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. LSHCX (28.39).
| FSMAX | LSHCX | FSMAX / LSHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.45 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 22.037 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 30.6M | 139,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.14 | 352% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -8.99 | -325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 55.64 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 28.39 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 200.33 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement