Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MACGX
FSMAX vs MACGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MACGX
FSMAX vs MACGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MACGX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MACGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. MACGX (780M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MACGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MACGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MACGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MACGX (29 years). MACGX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MACGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACGX: FSMAX (0) vs MACGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.94 vs. MACGX (-3.38). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.73 vs. MACGX (-50.87).
| FSMAX | MACGX | FSMAX / MACGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.403 | -1.808 | -797% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 780M | 5,474% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.94 | -3.38 | -827% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.15 | 76.87 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.73 | -50.87 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.10 | -42.56 | -346% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement