Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MACGX
FSMAX vs MACGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MACGX
FSMAX vs MACGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MACGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MACGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. MACGX (803M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MACGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs MACGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MACGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MACGX (29 years). MACGX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MACGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACGX: FSMAX (0) vs MACGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. MACGX (-2.34). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. MACGX (-48.57).
| FSMAX | MACGX | FSMAX / MACGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 3.255 | 489% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 803M | 5,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | -2.34 | -1,043% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 78.44 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -48.57 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | -41.75 | -333% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers